Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1998 (9) TMI 126 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal deems unsecured loan as dividend, rejects share application claim The Tribunal upheld the decision to treat the unsecured loan as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, charging it to tax. The ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal deems unsecured loan as dividend, rejects share application claim

                          The Tribunal upheld the decision to treat the unsecured loan as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, charging it to tax. The Tribunal emphasized that the statutory description of the amount in the balance sheet as an unsecured loan was prima facie evidence, and the assessee failed to prove it was share application money. The Tribunal also rejected the argument of procedural hurdles under the Companies Act, stating that violations do not alter the transaction's nature. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower authorities' decision.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Applicability of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act.
                          2. Nature of the unsecured loan received by the assessee.
                          3. Shareholding pattern and substantial interest.
                          4. Procedural hurdles under the Companies Act.
                          5. Treatment of the loan as deemed dividend.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Applicability of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act:
                          The primary issue revolves around whether the unsecured loan of Rs. 41,05,122 received by the assessee from M/s. Hyderabad Chemical Supplies Ltd. should be treated as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act. The Assessing Officer concluded that the loan attracted the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) because the shareholders held substantial interest in both companies. The CIT(A) and the Tribunal upheld this view, emphasizing that the conditions for deemed dividend were satisfied.

                          2. Nature of the Unsecured Loan Received by the Assessee:
                          The assessee contended that the amount described as an unsecured loan in the balance sheet was actually share application money or a trade advance. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) rejected this contention, stating that the books of account, which are statutorily maintained, described the amount as an unsecured loan. The Tribunal agreed, noting that the description in the balance sheet was prima facie evidence, and the assessee failed to substantiate its claim that the amount was share application money.

                          3. Shareholding Pattern and Substantial Interest:
                          The Assessing Officer noted that the shareholders of Hyderabad Chemical Supplies Ltd. held substantial interest in the assessee-company, thus attracting the provisions of Section 2(22)(e). The Tribunal upheld this view, stating that the conditions for deemed dividend were satisfied, as the shareholders held more than 20% of the voting power in the assessee-company.

                          4. Procedural Hurdles under the Companies Act:
                          The assessee argued that the loan was initially shown as an unsecured loan due to procedural hurdles under the Companies Act, which prevented the immediate formation of a subsidiary company. The CIT(A) and the Tribunal rejected this argument, stating that procedural violations do not change the nature of the transaction. The Tribunal emphasized that the design to circumvent the Companies Act by initially introducing unsecured loans and later converting them into share capital could not be approved.

                          5. Treatment of the Loan as Deemed Dividend:
                          The Tribunal upheld the treatment of the unsecured loan as deemed dividend, stating that the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) were clearly applicable. The Tribunal noted that the loan was given out of accumulated profits and was for the benefit of the assessee-company. The Tribunal also rejected the affidavits and other evidence provided by the assessee as self-serving and not credible.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision of the lower authorities to treat the unsecured loan of Rs. 41,05,122 as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act and charging it to tax. The Tribunal emphasized that the statutory description of the amount in the balance sheet as an unsecured loan was prima facie evidence, and the assessee failed to substantiate its claim that the amount was share application money. The Tribunal also rejected the procedural hurdles argument, stating that procedural violations do not change the nature of the transaction.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found