Cash loans and repayments above s.269SS limits for factory construction-reasonable cause accepted; s.271D and s.271E penalties cancelled

Penalties under s.271D for cash acceptance of loans exceeding the s.269SS threshold were examined on the assessee's plea of "reasonable cause" under s.273B. The Tribunal held the cash borrowings were driven by genuine business exigencies for factory construction, were not intentional, and did not frustrate the anti-tax evasion object of s.269SS; hence the breach was merely technical. The penalty under s.271D was therefore set aside and cancelled. Separately, penalty under s.271E was held unsustainable because s.269T/s.271E, on a plain reading, govern repayment of "deposits" and conspicuously omit "loans"; repayment of loans in cash was thus outside s.269T. In any event, reasonable cause was shown. The s.271E penalty was cancelled and the appeals were allowed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Penalty u/s 271D for violation of section 269SS.
2. Penalty u/s 271E for violation of section 269T.

Summary:

Issue 1: Penalty u/s 271D for violation of section 269SS

The assessee, a firm engaged in the manufacture and sale of bricks, was penalized for accepting loans in cash exceeding Rs. 20,000 from four individuals, violating section 269SS. The assessee argued that the loans were taken during the construction phase due to financial constraints and lack of timely bank loans. The CIT(A) reduced the penalty from Rs. 2,21,000 to Rs. 1,69,000, considering some loans were taken on Sundays and initial amounts were less than Rs. 20,000. The Tribunal found that the assessee had reasonable cause for accepting cash loans due to financial exigencies and lack of intent to evade tax. The Tribunal concluded that the violation was technical and not intentional, thus setting aside the penalty u/s 271D.

Issue 2: Penalty u/s 271E for violation of section 269T

The assessee was also penalized for repaying loans in cash exceeding Rs. 10,000, violating section 269T. The CIT(A) reduced the penalty from Rs. 1,35,000 to Rs. 1,25,000, considering repayments made on Sundays. The assessee contended that section 269T applies only to deposits, not loans. The Tribunal agreed, noting the distinct legal definitions and the absence of the term 'loan' in section 269T. The Tribunal held that the repayment of loans in cash did not violate section 269T and found reasonable cause for the cash repayments due to financial constraints. Consequently, the penalty u/s 271E was also cancelled.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals, cancelling the penalties u/s 271D and 271E, and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.

---