Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalties under section 271D and section 271E were leviable for cash acceptance and repayment of deposits in excess of the statutory limit, and whether the assessee had shown reasonable cause under section 273B.
Analysis: The statutory scheme of sections 269SS and 269T prohibits acceptance and repayment of loans or deposits otherwise than by prescribed banking modes, and sections 271D and 271E provide for penalty for breach. However, section 273B saves the assessee from penalty where reasonable cause is proved. The transactions in question were between the assessee and its members in the course of its regular banking activity, were recorded in the books, and were treated as genuine by the Revenue. The assessee's conduct was found to be under a bona fide belief that the provisions were not attracted to its case, having regard to the nature of its activities and the mutual character of the dealings.
Conclusion: The penalty provisions were held not to be invocable on the facts, and the penalties under section 271D and section 271E were deleted.