Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amounts paid by the Indian company to the foreign collaborators for deputing technicians to India were taxable in the hands of the technicians as salary under the Income-tax Act, or were payments for technical services not chargeable as salary.
Analysis: The technicians were deputed by their foreign employers under collaboration agreements entered into by the foreign collaborators with the Indian company. The Indian company's obligation was to pay the stipulated fees to the foreign collaborators on a per diem basis, while the technicians continued to be in the employment of their respective foreign principals and there was no privity of contract or employer-employee relationship between the technicians and the Indian company. The nature of the payment under the collaboration agreements was therefore decisive. Payments made for deputation of technical personnel under approved collaboration agreements were treated as fees for technical services and not as salary earned in India. On that basis, the Explanation to Section 9(1)(ii) did not govern the receipts as salary income, and the amounts were not taxable as salary in the hands of the technicians.
Conclusion: The assessment of the amounts as salary income was unsustainable and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where foreign technicians are deputed to India under an approved collaboration agreement and the Indian company pays the foreign collaborator for technical services, the payment is not salary in the hands of the technicians in the absence of an employer-employee relationship with the Indian company.