House property income, tenant electricity charges, and interest levy challenges: deductible expenses and appealability clarified under tax law.

In computing income from house property, no separate deduction was available for chowkidar salary because sections 23 and 24 did not provide an independent allowance beyond collection charges, so the deduction was disallowed. Electricity charges recovered from tenants could be excluded from gross rental receipts for annual value purposes if it was proved that those amounts were included in rent, making the point evidence-dependent. A challenge to levy of interest under sections 139(8) and 217(1A) was maintainable in an appeal under section 246 where the assessment was also under appeal on other grounds, so the appellate authority could entertain that ground.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether salary paid to a chowkidar was deductible in computing income from house property under sections 23 and 24 of the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) whether electricity charges recovered from tenants were to be excluded from gross rental receipts while determining annual value; and (iii) whether an assessee could challenge levy of interest under sections 139(8) and 217(1A) in an appeal under section 246.

Issue (i): whether salary paid to a chowkidar was deductible in computing income from house property under sections 23 and 24 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: No separate allowance for chowkidar salary was permissible under the scheme of sections 23 and 24. The allowance of collection charges already covered such expenditure, and there was no independent statutory basis for a further deduction.

Conclusion: The deduction was not allowable and the direction allowing it was reversed.

Issue (ii): whether electricity charges recovered from tenants were to be excluded from gross rental receipts while determining annual value.

Analysis: Electricity charges, if recovered as part of rent and not separately as an independent payment, did not form part of rent for the purpose of computing annual value. The matter depended on proof that the rent received included electricity charges.

Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to exclusion of electricity charges from gross rental receipts if she proved that such amounts were included in rent.

Issue (iii): whether an assessee could challenge levy of interest under sections 139(8) and 217(1A) in an appeal under section 246.

Analysis: A challenge to interest was maintainable where the assessment was also under appeal on other grounds. The bar against appeal against mere levy of interest applied only where interest was the sole issue.

Conclusion: The appeal on the levy of interest was maintainable and the appellate authority was justified in entertaining it.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only in part, with the deduction for chowkidar salary rejected, the electricity-charge question left to be proved on evidence, and the challenge to interest levy held maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi: In computing income from house property, no deduction is allowable for chowkidar salary absent statutory authority, electricity charges recovered as part of rent may be excluded from annual value if duly proved, and a levy of interest may be contested in appeal where the assessment is also challenged on other grounds.

---