Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for computing profit under section 41(2), only the depreciation actually allowed in the earlier assessments was to be taken into account where the returns had been processed under section 143(1) without any claim for depreciation.
Analysis: The assessments for the relevant years had been completed under section 143(1) on the basis of the returns filed by the assessee, and the Revenue did not controvert that no depreciation had been claimed in those returns. On that footing, the computation of profit under section 41(2) had to be made with reference to the depreciation actually allowed, and not on an assumed basis.
Conclusion: The assessee's contention was accepted, the deletion made by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was upheld, and the Department's challenge failed.