Interest-tax Act scope narrowed to loans and advances; deposit interest needed factual review, while securities income stayed outside charge.

The Interest-tax Act defines "interest" exhaustively and confines the charge to interest on loans and advances, so the statute cannot be expanded by ordinary meaning. Interest on short-term deposits placed with public sector undertakings and credit institutions was not automatically taxable as chargeable interest, and the factual character of those transactions required fresh examination. Interest on securities and bonds was outside the tax base because the amended definition did not enlarge the levy to cover such income. The legislative scheme was read as widening the class of taxable entities, not the scope of taxable interest, so the addition for securities and bonds was to be deleted.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether interest earned on short-term deposits placed with public sector undertakings and credit institutions is chargeable under the definition of "interest" in the Interest-tax Act; (ii) Whether interest earned on investments in securities and bonds falls within "interest" and is exigible to tax under the Interest-tax Act.

Issue (i): Whether interest earned on short-term deposits placed with public sector undertakings and credit institutions is chargeable under the definition of "interest" in the Interest-tax Act.

Analysis: The definition of "interest" in Section 2(7) of the Interest-tax Act was treated as exhaustive, with "means" and "includes" used in a restrictive sense. The charge under Section 5 was confined to interest on loans and advances, and the statute did not permit expansion of the charging provision by reference to a general or natural meaning. The Court distinguished loans from deposits by applying settled principles that a deposit is ordinarily made at the instance of the depositor and is repayable on demand or on maturity, whereas a loan is advanced at the borrower's instance and is repayable as a loan. On that basis, interest on deposits was not automatically within the charging provision. However, because the assessee had placed evidence regarding the nature of the transactions after the original assessment, the additions relating to deposits required factual reconsideration by the Assessing Officer.

Conclusion: Interest on short-term deposits was not conclusively taxable merely as "interest" under Section 2(7), and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration on the factual character of the transactions.

Issue (ii): Whether interest earned on investments in securities and bonds falls within "interest" and is exigible to tax under the Interest-tax Act.

Analysis: The amended definition of "interest" under Section 2(7) after 1 October 1991 was read as excluding interest on securities from the tax base and as confining the levy to interest on loans and advances, apart from the specifically included categories. The Court held that the omission of the earlier exclusion did not enlarge the levy so as to bring securities and bonds within the charge. The legislative scheme, including the Finance Minister's speech, supported the view that the amendment widened the class of taxable entities, not the substantive scope of taxable interest. Accordingly, interest from securities and bonds could not be brought within the definition of chargeable interest.

Conclusion: Interest earned on securities and bonds was outside the scope of chargeable interest and the addition was directed to be deleted.

Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the issue of interest from securities and bonds, while the issue concerning interest on deposits was sent back for fresh adjudication, leaving the appeals only partly allowed for statistical purposes.

Ratio Decidendi: Under the Interest-tax Act, "interest" is an exhaustive statutory definition confined to interest on loans and advances and does not extend to deposits or securities unless expressly brought within the charging provision.

---