Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest on debentures, bonds and Government securities formed part of "interest" chargeable to interest-tax under section 2(7) of the Interest-tax Act, 1974.
Analysis: The definition in section 2(7) was held to be exhaustive because it uses the words "means and includes". The main part of the definition covers interest on loans and advances, while the inclusive part extends it only to commitment charges and discount on promissory notes and bills of exchange. Interest on securities was not expressly included, and the deletion of the earlier exclusion could not by itself enlarge the charging provision. The Court distinguished investment in securities from lending by loans and advances, holding that an investment may create a debtor-creditor relationship but does not necessarily amount to a loan. The commercial and economic character of bonds, debentures and Government securities, the Finance Minister's speech, and the statutory context all indicated that the levy was intended to cover financing transactions and not interest from securities.
Conclusion: Interest on debentures, bonds and Government securities was not chargeable to tax under the Interest-tax Act, 1974.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a charging definition uses "means and includes", only the specifically covered species can be taxed, and interest on securities cannot be brought within interest-tax unless the statute clearly includes it.