Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1985 (5) TMI 101 - AT - Wealth-tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal decision: Appeal allowed in part, assets included in wealth, loan liability upheld The Tribunal allowed the appeal in IT Appeal No. 1664 (Delhi) of 1983 and partially allowed other appeals. The value of assets was included in the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Tribunal decision: Appeal allowed in part, assets included in wealth, loan liability upheld

                            The Tribunal allowed the appeal in IT Appeal No. 1664 (Delhi) of 1983 and partially allowed other appeals. The value of assets was included in the assessee's wealth due to the lack of evidence for a valid transfer and the revocable nature of the transfer. The liability of Rs. 10,000 for the loan from Shri Jage Ram was upheld, and the exclusion of the value of 25,000 shares of Hindustan Garments Ltd. was accepted based on findings in previous income-tax proceedings.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Validity of the transfer of assets to the HUF.
                            2. Consideration of the transfer as revocable under Section 4(1)(a)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
                            3. Allowance of liability of Rs. 10,000 on account of a loan from Shri Jage Ram.
                            4. Exclusion of the value of 25,000 shares of Hindustan Garments Ltd.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Validity of the Transfer of Assets to the HUF:

                            The primary issue was whether the wealth amounting to Rs. 2,10,640 should be excluded from the wealth of the assessee due to the alleged transfer to the HUF. The assessee claimed that he had gifted shares and deposits to the HUF through an affidavit dated 30-10-1968. However, the WTO argued that there was no evidence of an actual transfer, as the shares and deposits remained in the name of the assessee, and no formal request for transfer was made to the companies involved. The AAC accepted the affidavit as sufficient evidence of the gift, but the Tribunal noted that the affidavit alone, without further action, did not constitute a valid transfer. The Tribunal concluded that there was no material evidence to support the transfer of assets to the HUF, and thus, the value of the assets should be included in the assessee's wealth.

                            2. Consideration of the Transfer as Revocable under Section 4(1)(a)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957:

                            The Tribunal also examined whether the transfer, if considered valid, was revocable. The affidavit specified that the dividends and interest from the transferred assets were to be paid to the assessee for ten years. According to Section 4(1)(a)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, a transfer is not irrevocable if the transferor derives any direct or indirect benefit. The Tribunal held that since the transferor reserved the right to receive income from the assets for ten years, the transfer was revocable. Therefore, the value of the assets should be included in the assessee's wealth.

                            3. Allowance of Liability of Rs. 10,000 on Account of a Loan from Shri Jage Ram:

                            The second issue involved the allowance of a liability of Rs. 10,000 for a loan from Shri Jage Ram. The AAC allowed this liability based on findings in previous income-tax appeals, where the loan was deemed genuine, and the interest claim was accepted. The Tribunal upheld the AAC's decision, declining to interfere with the allowance of the liability.

                            4. Exclusion of the Value of 25,000 Shares of Hindustan Garments Ltd.:

                            The final issue concerned the exclusion of the value of 25,000 shares of Hindustan Garments Ltd., which the assessee claimed were purchased on behalf of certain agriculturists. The ITO had not accepted the genuineness of these loans, but in income-tax proceedings, it was determined that the shares were indeed purchased for the benefit of the agriculturists. The Tribunal noted that the shares were later transferred to the agriculturists through a compromise decree before the High Court. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the department's grounds relating to these shares for all the assessment years involved.

                            Conclusion:

                            The Tribunal allowed the appeal in IT Appeal No. 1664 (Delhi) of 1983 and partially allowed the other appeals. The value of the assets was included in the assessee's wealth due to the lack of evidence for a valid transfer and the revocable nature of the transfer. The liability of Rs. 10,000 for the loan from Shri Jage Ram was upheld, and the exclusion of the value of 25,000 shares of Hindustan Garments Ltd. was accepted based on the findings in previous income-tax proceedings.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found