Appeals Dismissed for Procedural Issues; Some Deductions Upheld, Additions Restored, and Clarifications on s. 43B Applied.

The appeals in ITA Nos. 3607/Del/1990, 7815/Del/1989, 5035/Del/1998, and 3910/Del/2000 were dismissed due to procedural issues, including the absence of COD approval. Other appeals were partly allowed, with the Tribunal upholding certain deductions and deletions, such as those related to reserves for doubtful debts and export market development allowances, while restoring some additions, like entertainment expenditure incurred outside India. The Tribunal also clarified that certain provisions, such as s. 43B, were not applicable for specific assessment years, leading to the deletion of disallowances and additions made by the AO.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Approval from Committee on Disputes (COD)
2. Reserve for Doubtful Debts
3. Reserve for Export Market Development Allowance
4. Entertainment Expenditure Incurred Outside India
5. Deduction of Reserve for Bad and Doubtful Debts
6. Disallowance u/s 43B
7. Interest Not Recorded
8. Investment Written Off

Summary:

1. Approval from Committee on Disputes (COD):
The assessee, a public sector undertaking, required COD approval for prosecuting appeals. The necessary approval was filed in all appeals except ITA Nos. 5035/Del/1998 and 3910/Del/2000. These appeals were dismissed due to the absence of COD approval, with liberty to refile upon obtaining approval.

2. Reserve for Doubtful Debts:
The Revenue's appeals for AYs 1984-85, 1982-83, and 1983-84 disputed the deletion of additions by the CIT(A) on account of reserve for doubtful debts. The Tribunal followed the Delhi High Court's judgment in the assessee's own case for AYs 1974-75 and 1975-76, dismissing the Revenue's grounds of appeal.

3. Reserve for Export Market Development Allowance:
The Tribunal noted that the issue was previously decided in favor of the assessee for AY 1978-79. The Tribunal found that the reserve for export market development allowance could not be added to book profits for AYs prior to 1989-90, following the Supreme Court's judgment in General Insurance Corpn. of India vs. CIT and the Bombay High Court's judgment in CIT vs. South India Insurance Co. Ltd.

4. Entertainment Expenditure Incurred Outside India:
For AYs 1982-83 and 1983-84, the assessee conceded that entertainment expenditure incurred outside India is hit by s. 37(2A). The Tribunal restored the addition made by the AO.

5. Deduction of Reserve for Bad and Doubtful Debts:
For AY 1986-87, the Tribunal followed the Delhi High Court's judgment and rejected the Revenue's ground of appeal against the CIT(A)'s allowance of deduction for reserve for bad and doubtful debts.

6. Disallowance u/s 43B:
The Tribunal held that s. 43B, incorporated in r. 5(a) of the First Schedule from AY 1989-90, could not be applied to AY 1986-87. The CIT(A) was justified in deleting the disallowance of Rs. 14,76,232 made by the AO.

7. Interest Not Recorded:
For AY 1990-91, the Tribunal followed its previous decision in the assessee's case for AY 1986-87 and deleted the addition made by the AO on account of interest not recorded.

8. Investment Written Off:
The Tribunal held that the write-off of investments, in accordance with guidelines issued by the General Insurance Corporation, represented a "loss" and not an "expenditure" or "allowance." The AO erred in adding back the same, and the CIT(A) erred in confirming it. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition for AY 1990-91 and allowed the assessee's contention for subsequent years.

Conclusion:
The appeals in ITA Nos. 3607/Del/1990, 7815/Del/1989, 5035/Del/1998, and 3910/Del/2000 were dismissed, while the other appeals were partly allowed.

---