Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the gifted immovable property was required to be valued under the rent capitalisation method under the valuation rules applicable to gift-tax, or whether the revenue was justified in discarding the disclosed rent and adopting a valuation on estimate basis under the open market value method.
Analysis: The disclosed rent could not be rejected as collusive or concessional merely on suspicion, especially when the income-tax records had consistently accepted the rent and there was no reliable material to show that the letting arrangement was a device to depress value. For valuation under the applicable rules, the relevant enquiry was the net maintainable rent, and where the property was let and the actual rent exceeded the municipal valuation, the actual rent constituted the gross maintainable rent. Rule 3 of Schedule III was therefore workable on the facts. Rule 8 could not be invoked unless it was shown that Rule 3 was not practicable and the prescribed prior approval had been obtained. That precondition was not satisfied, so Rule 20 could not be applied.
Conclusion: The revenue was not justified in discarding the assessee's disclosed value or in adopting the Valuation Officer's estimate. The property had to be valued under Rule 3 on the basis of the disclosed rent, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the actual rent and municipal valuation provide the basis for computing net maintainable rent, Rule 3 of Schedule III applies and the special estimate method under Rule 20 cannot be used unless non-practicability of Rule 3 and the requisite prior approval are established.