Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee had a permanent establishment in India in relation to the offshore project receipts and, consequently, whether the income from activities carried on outside India was taxable in India.
Analysis: The contracts and the contemporaneous certificates showed that the relevant work relating to designing, fabrication, transportation and related offshore activities was performed mainly in Korea and that the assessee had no presence at the offshore site before the arrival of the structures. The Revenue did not bring material to show that the assessee maintained a fixed place of business, supervisory infrastructure or other features necessary to constitute a permanent establishment in India for the concerned projects. The findings recorded for the immediately preceding year had also attained finality, and the facts for the year under appeal were found to be materially similar. In the absence of proof that the receipts were attributable to any permanent establishment in India, the treaty provisions governing business profits did not permit taxation in India of the outside-India receipts.
Conclusion: The assessee had no permanent establishment in India for the disputed offshore receipts, and the income from the activities carried on outside India was not taxable in India.