Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1982 (8) TMI 104 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Incentive bonus for LIC employee not taxable as salary; categorized as professional income. Deduction allowed for expenses. The Tribunal held that the incentive bonus received by the assessee, a regular employee of Life Insurance Corporation of India, is not assessable under ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Incentive bonus for LIC employee not taxable as salary; categorized as professional income. Deduction allowed for expenses.

                            The Tribunal held that the incentive bonus received by the assessee, a regular employee of Life Insurance Corporation of India, is not assessable under Section 15 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The bonus was categorized as "income from profession" rather than "salary" due to the nature of the employment as a Development Officer. The Tribunal allowed a deduction of 40% of the expenses incurred by the assessee in earning the incentive bonus. The reference applications were dismissed as no referable question of law arose from the Tribunal's decision.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Whether the incentive bonus received by the assessee, a regular employee of Life Insurance Corporation of India, is assessable under Section 15 of the IT Act, 1961.
                            2. The nature of employment and the categorization of incentive bonus for tax purposes.
                            3. The allowance of expenses incurred to earn the incentive bonus.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            Issue 1: Assessability of Incentive Bonus under Section 15 of the IT Act, 1961
                            The primary issue was whether the incentive bonus received by the assessee, a regular employee of Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), is assessable under Section 15 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal concluded that the incentive bonus is not assessable under Section 15. The Tribunal noted that the definition of "salary" under Section 15 does not mention "bonus" and that Section 17, which defines "salary" for the purposes of Sections 15 and 16, also carefully avoids including the word "bonus." The Tribunal emphasized that the legislature has made separate provisions for the deduction of bonus under Section 36(1)(ii) of the Act, which applies to business income and not to salaries. Therefore, the incentive bonus received by the assessee does not fall under the purview of "salaries" as defined in Section 15.

                            Issue 2: Nature of Employment and Categorization of Incentive Bonus
                            The Tribunal examined the nature of the assessee's employment with LIC. The assessee was employed as a Development Officer, whose duties differed fundamentally from other regular employees. Development Officers are field workers who contact agents and prospective policyholders, and their remuneration is partly based on the results of their efforts. The Tribunal found that the incentive bonus was linked to the business secured in excess of certain stipulated premium income. The Tribunal concluded that the incentive bonus was earned by the assessee through field duties and was not a part of the regular salary. The incentive bonus was thus categorized as "income from profession" rather than "salary."

                            Issue 3: Allowance of Expenses Incurred to Earn the Incentive Bonus
                            The assessee claimed a deduction for expenses incurred to earn the incentive bonus, initially at 40%, which the Income Tax Officer (ITO) rejected, allowing only the standard deduction under Section 16(1). The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) partially accepted the claim, allowing expenses at 20% of the gross incentive bonus. The Tribunal, after considering the rival submissions and the facts on record, found that the assessee had indeed incurred expenses to secure business and earn the incentive bonus. The Tribunal noted that there were guidelines by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) allowing 40% expenses for insurance agents, though the specific circular was not brought to their notice. The Tribunal concluded that the expenses at 40% were reasonable and directed that the entire 40% expenses be allowed, thereby overturning the AAC's decision to restrict the allowance to 20%.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal dismissed the reference applications, holding that no referable question of law arises out of the order of the Tribunal. The incentive bonus received by the assessee is not assessable under Section 15 of the IT Act, 1961, and should be treated as "income from profession." Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the deduction of 40% of the expenses incurred by the assessee in earning the incentive bonus.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found