Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale of shares could be treated as a deemed gift under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 on the footing that the consideration was inadequate and the transaction was not bona fide.
Analysis: Section 4(1)(a) applies only where property is transferred otherwise than for adequate consideration. The burden lies on the revenue to establish inadequacy of consideration before the deeming fiction can be invoked. On the material on record, the assessee produced evidence of contemporaneous sales at the same or similar price, public advertisements, supporting correspondence, and prior group cases indicating that the transactions were genuine. The revenue relied mainly on break-up valuation and did not bring comparable evidence to show that the declared price was not fair or reasonable. In these circumstances, the statutory precondition for invoking the deeming provision was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The invocation of section 4(1)(a) was not sustainable and the deemed gift addition was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A deemed gift under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 can be sustained only if the revenue first proves that the transfer was for inadequate consideration and not a bona fide transaction.