Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether a partnership firm's sale of shares to its own partners constituted a transfer attracting gift-tax. (ii) Whether the transfer of unquoted shares to the partners' wives and mother for Rs. 75 per share was for inadequate consideration so as to attract section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958.
Issue (i): Whether a partnership firm's sale of shares to its own partners constituted a transfer attracting gift-tax.
Analysis: The firm sold specific shares for cash consideration to each partner, and after the sale each partner became exclusively entitled to the shares transferred to him. The situation was not one of conversion of individual property into partnership property, nor a case of adjustment of partnership assets on dissolution. The authorities relied on decisions dealing with different factual settings, which had no application here. On these facts, there was a transfer within the meaning of the Gift-tax Act.
Conclusion: The transfer to the partners was a taxable transfer and was not exempt from gift-tax.
Issue (ii): Whether the transfer of unquoted shares to the partners' wives and mother for Rs. 75 per share was for inadequate consideration so as to attract section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958.
Analysis: For unquoted shares, the market value could properly be determined by the break-up value method. The Gift-tax Officer found the market value of each share to be higher than Rs. 75, and that method was legally recognised. The Tribunal erred in treating the acquisition cost as Rs. 50 per share instead of the correct figure and in ignoring the statutory basis for comparing market value with consideration. The transfers were therefore otherwise than for adequate consideration.
Conclusion: Section 4(1)(a) applied and the transfers to the three ladies were liable to gift-tax.
Final Conclusion: Both referred questions were answered against the assessee, and the gift-tax assessment was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: A transfer of specific property by a partnership firm to named partners for consideration is a taxable transfer under the Gift-tax Act, and where unquoted shares are transferred, inadequacy of consideration is to be judged by comparing the consideration with the legally determined market value, including by the break-up value method.