1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Transfer of Shares to Partners & Relatives Deemed Gift under Gift-tax Act: High Court Decision</h1> The High Court held that the transfer of shares by an assessee-firm to its partners constituted a gift under the Gift-tax Act due to inadequate ... Adequate Consideration, Break Up Method, Gift Tax, Market Value, Unquoted Shares Issues:1. Whether the transfer of shares by the assessee-firm to its partners constitutes a gift under the Gift-tax Act.2. Whether the transfer of shares to three ladies, wives, and mother of the partners, was for inadequate consideration under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act.Analysis:Issue 1: Transfer of Shares to PartnersThe Gift-tax Officer deemed the transfer of shares by the assessee-firm to its partners as a gift due to inadequate consideration. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner disagreed, stating no transfer occurred. The Tribunal upheld the appeal, finding no transfer under the Gift-tax Act definition. However, the High Court disagreed with the Tribunal, citing precedents. The Court clarified that the partners became exclusively entitled to the shares sold to them, constituting a transfer. The inadequate consideration led to a deemed gift under section 4(1)(a), attracting gift-tax liability. The first issue was answered against the assessee.Issue 2: Transfer of Shares to Three LadiesThe Gift-tax Officer used the break-up value method to determine market value, concluding the transfer was for inadequate consideration. The Tribunal erred by not considering this method and making irrelevant observations. The High Court clarified that the transfer to the wives and mother of the partners required assessing market value. As the Tribunal misunderstood the cost of acquisition, it erred in ruling section 4(1)(a) did not apply. Consequently, the second issue was also decided against the assessee.In conclusion, the High Court ruled against the assessee on both issues, affirming the gift-tax liability.