Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the multiplier applied for valuation of the two immovable properties under the rental method was excessive, and whether the age of the property could justify a higher multiplier.
Analysis: The valuation was to be made by adopting the rental method with an appropriate multiplying factor. The Tribunal found that a multiplier of 12 was reasonable for the property at 14, Phears Lane, and there was no justification for applying a higher multiplier of 14 to the property at 16, Phears Lane merely because it was comparatively newer. The age of the property was held to be an irrelevant consideration for fixing the multiplier.
Conclusion: The multiplier for both properties was reduced to 12, and the assessee succeeded to that extent.