<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (4) TMI 108 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59812</link>
    <description>Under the rental method for valuing immovable property, the multiplier must reflect a reasonable capitalisation factor, and the age of the property is not a relevant basis for increasing it. The Tribunal held that a multiplier of 12 was appropriate for the properties in question and rejected a higher multiplier of 14 for the newer property. The multiplier for both properties was reduced to 12, and the assessee succeeded to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:44:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=98261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (4) TMI 108 - ITAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59812</link>
      <description>Under the rental method for valuing immovable property, the multiplier must reflect a reasonable capitalisation factor, and the age of the property is not a relevant basis for increasing it. The Tribunal held that a multiplier of 12 was appropriate for the properties in question and rejected a higher multiplier of 14 for the newer property. The multiplier for both properties was reduced to 12, and the assessee succeeded to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>