Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1981 (3) TMI 104 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Estate duty valuation, deductible tax debts and Hindu undivided family share computation were partly decided in favour of the assessee. Where a deceased partner had already retired before death and the continuing partners took over the firm's assets and liabilities, the deceased's share in ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Estate duty valuation, deductible tax debts and Hindu undivided family share computation were partly decided in favour of the assessee.

                            Where a deceased partner had already retired before death and the continuing partners took over the firm's assets and liabilities, the deceased's share in goodwill did not pass on death and was not includible to estate duty. Income-tax and wealth-tax liabilities relating to periods before death were deductible as debts against the estate because they were enforceable obligations. In computing the deceased's notional share in the smaller Hindu undivided family, a reasonable provision for the marriage expenses of unmarried daughters was to be made before fixing coparcenary shares. The valuation of the Takhteshahi Road property was left unchanged because no material justified reduction on the basis of Hindu undivided family ownership.




                            Issues: (i) whether the value of the goodwill passed on the death of the deceased and was includible under section 9 of the Estate Duty Act; (ii) whether income-tax and wealth-tax liabilities pertaining to the period prior to death were deductible as debts against the estate; (iii) whether a reasonable provision for the marriage expenses of unmarried daughters was allowable while computing the deceased's share in the smaller Hindu undivided family; and (iv) whether the valuation of the Takhteshahi Road property required reduction on the footing that it belonged to the Hindu undivided family.

                            Issue (i): whether the value of the goodwill passed on the death of the deceased and was includible under section 9 of the Estate Duty Act.

                            Analysis: The retirement of the deceased from the firm before death was accepted on the material on record, including the subsequent partnership deed showing that he had retired on 9 October 1974. Following the governing principle that where the deceased had already retired and the continuing partners took over the assets and liabilities, the share in goodwill did not pass on death and there was no taxable disposition attracting section 9.

                            Conclusion: In favour of the assessee. The addition on account of goodwill was deleted.

                            Issue (ii): whether income-tax and wealth-tax liabilities pertaining to the period prior to death were deductible as debts against the estate.

                            Analysis: The liabilities related to periods prior to death and therefore constituted enforceable obligations against the estate. A settlement clause stating that the settlement would not adversely affect estate duty assessment did not prevent statutory deduction where the tax was otherwise a charge on the estate. The tax liabilities were thus deductible as debts.

                            Conclusion: In favour of the assessee. The deduction for tax liabilities was directed to be allowed.

                            Issue (iii): whether a reasonable provision for the marriage expenses of unmarried daughters was allowable while computing the deceased's share in the smaller Hindu undivided family.

                            Analysis: The claim could not be allowed merely on the basis of the will, but in determining the notional share of the deceased in the smaller Hindu undivided family, reasonable provision for the marriage expenses of unmarried daughters had to be made before arriving at the coparcenary shares. On that basis, the claimed amount was treated as reasonable.

                            Conclusion: In favour of the assessee. The assessing authority was directed to recompute the deceased's share after allowing the provision.

                            Issue (iv): whether the valuation of the Takhteshahi Road property required reduction on the footing that it belonged to the Hindu undivided family.

                            Analysis: No material was found to disturb the valuation adopted below, and the contention that the property should be valued differently merely because it belonged to the Hindu undivided family was not accepted.

                            Conclusion: Against the assessee. The valuation was upheld.

                            Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on the principal questions of goodwill, deductible tax liabilities, and marriage provision in the family property computation, but failed on the property valuation issue, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.

                            Ratio Decidendi: Where a deceased partner had already retired and the continuing partners took over the firm's assets and liabilities, the share in goodwill does not pass on death for estate duty purposes; pre-death tax liabilities are deductible as debts of the estate; and a reasonable provision for unmarried daughters' marriages is to be made when determining the deceased's notional share in a Hindu undivided family.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found