Estate duty on partnership goodwill turns on devolution clauses, reciprocal retirement arrangements, and assessed-profit valuation principles.

A partner's share in firm goodwill was treated differently depending on the governing arrangements: where the partnership deed provided for devolution of assets, including goodwill, on the surviving partners, the deceased's share in Natwarlal & Co. was includible in the estate under section 5 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953. Where retirement deeds involved a reciprocal arrangement by which the retiring partner surrendered interests in assets, including goodwill, in return for takeover of liabilities and indemnity, the goodwill in Kantilal Manilal & Co. and Pannalal Bros. was not taxable under section 9 read with Explanation 2 to section 2(15). The goodwill valuation of Natwarlal & Co. was upheld because assessed profits, not returned profits, were a proper basis.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the deceased's share in the goodwill of the three firms was includible in the principal value of the estate under section 5 or section 9 read with Explanation 2 to clause (15) of section 2 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953. (ii) Whether the goodwill of the firm of Natwarlal & Co. was valued on correct legal principles.

Issue (i): Whether the deceased's share in the goodwill of the three firms was includible in the principal value of the estate under section 5 or section 9 read with Explanation 2 to clause (15) of section 2 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953.

Analysis: The partnership deed governing Natwarlal & Co. provided for devolution of all assets, including goodwill, on the continuing partners on death, with payment to the legal representatives for the deceased's share in the assets but not for goodwill. On that footing, there was no cesser of interest in the goodwill; the proper character of the transaction was devolution on death, attracting section 5. By contrast, in the retirement deeds relating to Kantilal Manilal & Co. and Pannalal Bros., the retiring partner gave up his interest in the assets including goodwill while the continuing partners took over the liabilities and indemnified the retiring partner. That was a reciprocal arrangement supported by consideration, so the transaction could not be treated as a gift or a transfer without consideration within section 9.

Conclusion: The deceased's share in the goodwill of Natwarlal & Co. was includible under section 5, but the shares in the goodwill of Kantilal Manilal & Co. and Pannalal Bros. were not includible under section 9 read with Explanation 2 to clause (15) of section 2.

Issue (ii): Whether the goodwill of the firm of Natwarlal & Co. was valued on correct legal principles.

Analysis: For quantification of goodwill, assessed profits finally determined were a proper basis rather than returned profits. The Tribunal's approach of using the assessed income and excluding the year of death for the average maintained profit calculation was accepted as legally sound.

Conclusion: The goodwill of Natwarlal & Co. was valued on correct legal principles.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered partly against the accountable person and partly in his favour, with inclusion sustained only for the deceased's share in the goodwill of Natwarlal & Co. and the valuation upheld for that firm.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the partnership deed provides for devolution of the deceased partner's share in the firm's assets, including goodwill, on the continuing partners, with only goodwill excluded from payment to the legal representatives, the case falls within section 5 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953; and a reciprocal retirement arrangement supported by surrender of assets and takeover of liabilities does not constitute an uncompensated gift within section 9.

---