Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1986 (7) TMI 153 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal allows assessee to carry forward loss under Income-tax Act despite late filing The Tribunal held that the return filed on 15-12-1982 should be treated as a return under section 139(4) of the Income-tax Act, allowing the assessee to ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal allows assessee to carry forward loss under Income-tax Act despite late filing

                          The Tribunal held that the return filed on 15-12-1982 should be treated as a return under section 139(4) of the Income-tax Act, allowing the assessee to carry forward the loss. The Tribunal emphasized that the provisions of section 148 do not override the right to file a return under section 139(4) and carry forward the loss. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, rejecting the department's contention to deny the benefit of carrying forward the loss due to the late filing of the return.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the return filed on 15-12-1982 should be treated as a return under section 139(4) or section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Whether the assessee is entitled to carry forward the loss determined in the return filed on 15-12-1982.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Treatment of Return Filed on 15-12-1982:
                          The assessee contended that the return filed on 15-12-1982 should be treated as a return under section 139(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) treated it as a return filed in response to a notice under section 148, issued due to the non-filing of the original return. The Tribunal examined the provisions of section 139, which prescribes various eventualities for filing returns. It was noted that the return was not filed under section 139(1) or section 139(2). However, it was filed within two years from the end of the assessment year and before the assessment was made, fitting the criteria under section 139(4). The Tribunal concluded that the return should be treated as a return under section 139(4), allowing the assessee to carry forward the loss.

                          2. Entitlement to Carry Forward the Loss:
                          The Tribunal analyzed the implications of section 148, which allows the ITO to issue a notice for assessing or reassessing income that has escaped assessment. The Tribunal observed that section 148 should not negate the assessee's right to file a return under section 139(4). The Tribunal referred to the Bombay High Court decision in Telster Advertising (P.) Ltd. v. CIT, which held that a return filed under section 139(4) should be treated as if it were filed under section 139(1), entitling the assessee to carry forward the loss. The Tribunal also considered the provisions of section 148, which state that a notice under section 148 should be treated as a notice under section 139(2). Consequently, the return filed in response to a notice under section 148 should be deemed a return under section 139(2), allowing the loss to be carried forward.

                          The Tribunal rejected the department's contention that the benefit of carrying forward the loss should be denied due to the late filing of the return. The Tribunal emphasized that the right to file a return within two years under section 139(4) cannot be taken away by issuing a notice under section 148. The Tribunal further noted that if the notice under section 148 is deemed invalid due to no income escaping assessment, the return should be treated as filed under section 139(4).

                          Analysis of Department's Reliance on Case Laws:
                          The Tribunal examined the cases cited by the department, including Kevaldas Ranchhodas v. CIT, S. Natarajan v. CIT, and Sun Engg. Works (P.) Ltd. v. CIT. The Tribunal found that these cases did not support the department's position as they dealt with different factual scenarios where returns were already filed, or the losses were not computed in the original assessments. The Tribunal concluded that these cases did not address the specific issue of denying the carry forward of loss determined in a return filed under section 139(4) or in response to a notice under section 148.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the return filed on 15-12-1982 should be treated as a return under section 139(4) and that the assessee is entitled to carry forward the loss determined in that return. The Tribunal emphasized that the provisions of section 148 do not override the assessee's right to file a return under section 139(4) and carry forward the loss.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found