TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate court modifies tax assessment, excludes 'house property' loss income.</h1> <h3>THIRD INCOME TAX OFFICER. Versus LS. BALASUBRAMANIAN.</h3> THIRD INCOME TAX OFFICER. Versus LS. BALASUBRAMANIAN. - TTJ 023, 376, Issues:1. Computation of income from house property.Analysis:The judgment revolves around the computation of income from house property by the Department. The assessee, an individual, had initially claimed a loss of Rs. 5,732 under the head 'house property'. However, the Income Tax Officer (ITO) disagreed and calculated the annual letting value after deductions, resulting in a balance of Rs. 641 to be taxed. The assessee then appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC), arguing for a further deduction under a specific provision.The AAC accepted the assessee's claim and directed the ITO to allow the additional deduction. Subsequently, the Department filed an appeal challenging this decision. The Department's argument was based on a provision that stated the income from a residential unit should not result in a loss. The Department contended that allowing the additional deduction would lead to a loss being computed, contrary to statutory provisions.The judgment analyzed the relevant clauses and provisions, emphasizing the use of the term 'income' in the context of determining annual letting value and deductions. The presiding member opined that the Department's argument was valid, highlighting the significance of interpreting the term 'income' in a manner consistent with the statutory framework. The judgment clarified that provisions leading to a loss under the head 'house property' should be disregarded, and the Department's stance was upheld.Conclusively, the judgment partially allowed the appeal filed by the Department, modifying the AAC's order to eliminate the income of Rs. 641 that was initially brought to assessment by the ITO.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
