Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, which got polythene bags stitched through an outside agency, was entitled to deduction under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and in particular whether the statutory requirement of employing 10 or more workers in a manufacturing process carried on with the aid of power was satisfied.
Analysis: The assessee was accepted as carrying on manufacture, but the deduction depended also on satisfying the worker-employment condition. The record showed that the assessee did not itself pay wages to any person engaged in the manufacturing process on its behalf. The workers engaged by an outside agency could not be treated as the assessee's own workers for the purposes of section 80-I, because the object of the provision is to encourage the setting up of an industrial undertaking by the assessee itself and that object would be defeated if employees of others were counted as its employees.
Conclusion: The statutory requirement of employing 10 or more workers was not met, so the assessee was not entitled to deduction under section 80-I.