Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2006 (2) TMI 199 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        ITAT dismisses Departmental appeal for 1995-96, allows assessee's appeal for 1996-97, deleting disputed capital gains and car transactions. The ITAT dismissed the Departmental appeal for the assessment year 1995-96 and allowed the assessee's appeal for the assessment year 1996-97, resulting in ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            ITAT dismisses Departmental appeal for 1995-96, allows assessee's appeal for 1996-97, deleting disputed capital gains and car transactions.

                            The ITAT dismissed the Departmental appeal for the assessment year 1995-96 and allowed the assessee's appeal for the assessment year 1996-97, resulting in the deletion of all disputed additions related to capital gains and car transactions.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Deletion of addition under the head "Capital gains" for the assessment year 1995-96.
                            2. Addition of Rs. 1,50,000 received on account of sale of an old car for the assessment year 1996-97.
                            3. Addition of Rs. 50,000 related to the purchase of a second-hand car for the assessment year 1996-97.
                            4. Addition of Rs. 13,91,164 on account of capital gains taxable under section 45(5) for the assessment year 1996-97.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            Issue 1: Deletion of Addition under the Head "Capital Gains" (Assessment Year 1995-96)
                            The Revenue challenged the deletion of Rs. 16,58,155 made by the AO under "Capital gains." The assessee had received enhanced compensation for land acquired by HUDA, claiming it was exempt from capital gains tax as the land was situated more than 8 km from the municipal limits of Panipat. The AO reopened the case based on a report that the land was within 8 km of the municipal limits and thus taxable. However, the CIT(A) found that the land was not a capital asset at the time of acquisition (1987 and 1991) as Panipat was not specified in the relevant notification until 6th Jan, 1994. The CIT(A) concluded that the enhanced compensation did not constitute taxable capital gains, a decision upheld by the ITAT.

                            Issue 2: Addition of Rs. 1,50,000 on Account of Sale of Old Car (Assessment Year 1996-97)
                            The AO added Rs. 1,50,000, disbelieving the sale of the old car. The assessee provided evidence including a broker's receipt and a letter from M/s Sumitra Industries, confirming the sale. The CIT(A) rejected the explanation due to discrepancies and the delay in using the cash for purchasing a new car. However, the ITAT found the sale of the car and the receipt of Rs. 1,50,000 credible, supported by certificates from the District Transport Authority. The ITAT ruled that the amount was available for the purchase of a new car and deleted the addition.

                            Issue 3: Addition of Rs. 50,000 Related to Purchase of Second-Hand Car (Assessment Year 1996-97)
                            The AO added Rs. 50,000, estimating the value of the car purchased at Rs. 3 lakhs instead of Rs. 2,50,000. The assessee provided a receipt and affidavit from the seller, arguing the car was second-hand and thus cheaper. The ITAT found the AO's estimation unjustified, noting the lack of market price investigation and evidence. The ITAT deleted the addition, accepting the assessee's explanation.

                            Issue 4: Addition of Rs. 13,91,164 on Account of Capital Gains Taxable Under Section 45(5) (Assessment Year 1996-97)
                            The CIT(A) added Rs. 13,91,164 as capital gains under section 45(5), noting the AO's omission. The ITAT followed its earlier decision in the Departmental appeal for 1995-96, ruling that the enhanced compensation was not taxable as capital gains. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and deleted the addition. The ITAT also noted that the CIT(A)'s power to enhance was restricted to the subject matter considered by the AO, referencing case laws supporting this view.

                            Conclusion
                            The ITAT dismissed the Departmental appeal for 1995-96 and allowed the assessee's appeal for 1996-97, resulting in the deletion of all disputed additions.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found