Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2006 (2) TMI 198 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal adjusts capital gains assessment, sets sale price at Rs. 22 lakhs per acre. The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part for both the assessee and the revenue. The assessment under section 144 was set aside, and the capital gains were ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal adjusts capital gains assessment, sets sale price at Rs. 22 lakhs per acre.

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part for both the assessee and the revenue. The assessment under section 144 was set aside, and the capital gains were to be computed based on a sale price of Rs. 22 lakhs per acre (Rs. 454 per sq. yard). The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the sale consideration shown in the sale deeds but adjusted the rate based on credible evidence.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer.
                          2. Validity of assessment under section 144.
                          3. Addition in Long-Term Capital Gains.
                          4. Estimation of sale price of land.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer:
                          - Not Pressed: The first ground of appeal concerning the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer was not pressed by the assessee's counsel. Therefore, this ground was dismissed as not pressed.

                          2. Validity of Assessment under Section 144:
                          - Assessee's Argument: The assessee argued that the Assessing Officer had no power to call for information about bank accounts in Canada and other personal details, which were irrelevant for the assessment year under consideration.
                          - Assessing Officer's Stand: The assessment was completed under section 144 due to the assessee's failure to comply with notices issued under sections 142(1) and 143(2). The information requested was deemed relevant for completing the assessment, especially concerning the sale of agricultural land at allegedly low rates.
                          - Tribunal's Finding: The Tribunal held that the information about the assessee's affairs in Canada was not relevant for the assessment. The Department could have obtained such information through the Foreign Tax Division of the C.B.D.T. The Tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer was not correct in completing the assessment under section 144 and set aside the CIT(A)'s order, treating the assessment under section 143(3).

                          3. Addition in Long-Term Capital Gains:
                          - Assessing Officer's Addition: The Assessing Officer added Rs. 97,70,390 to the Long-Term Capital Gains, estimating the sale price of the land at Rs. 500 per sq. yard instead of the declared Rs. 112.50 per sq. yard.
                          - CIT(A)'s Adjustment: The CIT(A) reduced the addition to Rs. 53,48,882, estimating the sale price at Rs. 400 per sq. yard.
                          - Assessee's Argument: The assessee contended that the sale price should be based on the registered sale deeds and that the Assessing Officer had no authority to estimate the sale proceeds. The assessee provided instances of other sales at lower rates and argued that the revenue officials would not have registered the sale deeds if the consideration was understated.
                          - Revenue's Argument: The Revenue argued that the sale consideration was understated, citing statements from Sukhbinder Singh and Gurwinder Singh, who claimed a deal at Rs. 22 lakhs per acre. The Revenue also referred to higher rates of nearby land sales and revised rates by District Revenue authorities.
                          - Tribunal's Decision: The Tribunal found the statements of Sukhbinder Singh and Gurwinder Singh credible and supported by other evidence. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer was justified in rejecting the sale consideration shown by the assessee but found no direct evidence to support the rate of Rs. 500 per sq. yard. The Tribunal concluded that the sale consideration should be Rs. 22 lakhs per acre (Rs. 454 per sq. yard), based on the credible testimony of Sukhbinder Singh and Gurwinder Singh.

                          4. Estimation of Sale Price of Land:
                          - Assessing Officer's Estimation: The Assessing Officer estimated the sale price at Rs. 500 per sq. yard.
                          - CIT(A)'s Estimation: The CIT(A) estimated the sale price at Rs. 400 per sq. yard.
                          - Tribunal's Estimation: The Tribunal determined the sale price at Rs. 22 lakhs per acre (Rs. 454 per sq. yard), based on the credible testimony of Sukhbinder Singh and Gurwinder Singh and other supporting evidence.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part for both the assessee and the revenue. The assessment under section 144 was set aside, and the capital gains were to be computed based on a sale price of Rs. 22 lakhs per acre (Rs. 454 per sq. yard). The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the sale consideration shown in the sale deeds but adjusted the rate based on credible evidence.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found