Registered land sale price vs prior agreement showing higher amount in s.132 search; capital gains upheld on deed value

In determining capital gains arising from a land transfer unearthed during a search under s.132, the dominant issue was whether the stated consideration in a registered sale deed could be disregarded on the basis of a prior agreement/receipt indicating a higher figure. The HC held that the consideration in the sale deed must ordinarily be accepted unless the Revenue proves that the agreement was acted upon and that the higher amount was actually paid; mere existence of an agreement or receipt is insufficient. On the evidence, including findings in the purchaser's assessment, the Tribunal's conclusion that the sale price was Rs. 8,000 per cent and not the higher figure was upheld, and the questions were answered for the assessee and against the Revenue.

---

---

Issues:
1. Interpretation of receipt acknowledgment and actual amount received by the assessee.
2. Determination of the actual sale price of land based on documentary evidence.
3. Validity of an agreement not acted upon in relation to the sale price.
4. Verification of payment intended for a third party.

Issue 1 - Interpretation of receipt acknowledgment:
The case involved questions regarding the acknowledgment of receipt by the assessee and the actual amount received. The Tribunal questioned whether the acknowledged amount of Rs. 5,98,999 was actually received in full, or only Rs. 2,00,000 was received and accounted for. The Tribunal considered the agreement and receipts to determine the actual amount received by the assessee, leading to a conclusion in favor of the assessee.

Issue 2 - Determination of actual sale price of land:
The Assessing Officer concluded that the land was sold at Rs. 12,951 per cent, differing from the declared Rs. 8,000 per cent by the assessee. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this finding, but the Tribunal set it aside, determining that the property was sold at the declared rate of Rs. 8,000 per cent. The Tribunal considered the agreement and receipts, ultimately accepting the assessee's claim based on the evidence presented.

Issue 3 - Validity of agreement not acted upon:
The Tribunal analyzed an agreement dated March 1, 1983, which stated a sale price of Rs. 12,951 per cent. The assessee argued that the agreement was not acted upon, and the receipt was incorrect. The Tribunal, after considering the evidence and the assessment order against another party, accepted the claim that the property was purchased at Rs. 8,000 per cent, disregarding the higher amount mentioned in the agreement.

Issue 4 - Verification of payment intended for a third party:
The Tribunal also examined whether a sum of Rs. 1,36,060 was intended to be paid to a third party. After reviewing the evidence and circumstances, the Tribunal concluded that the amount received was at the rate of Rs. 8,000 per cent, aligning with the assessee's position. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the sale deed price as a presumed correct amount unless proven otherwise, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.

In conclusion, the High Court of Kerala ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues, emphasizing the significance of the evidence presented, particularly the agreement, receipts, and sale deed, in determining the actual amounts involved in the transactions.

---