Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2000 (5) TMI 160 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Invalidity of IT Act notice and order under sec 263 due to lack of examination and application of mind. The Tribunal held that the notice and subsequent order issued under section 263 of the IT Act were invalid as they were made without proper examination of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Invalidity of IT Act notice and order under sec 263 due to lack of examination and application of mind.

                          The Tribunal held that the notice and subsequent order issued under section 263 of the IT Act were invalid as they were made without proper examination of the assessment records and without application of mind. It was determined that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. The Tribunal found that the liability on interest payable on deposits was contractual and determinate, and the CIT's conclusions lacked specific reasons. The doctrine of merger was applied, stating that once an issue is subject to appeal, the CIT's jurisdiction to revise the assessment order is ousted. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the notice and order under section 263, declaring them void ab initio.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Validity of the notice issued u/s 263 of the IT Act.
                          2. Whether the assessment order dated 27th March 1997 was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue.
                          3. Justification of CIT's conclusions regarding interest payable on deposits.
                          4. Doctrine of merger of the assessment order with the order of CIT(A).
                          5. Examination of the liability on account of interest payable on deposits.

                          Summary:

                          Issue No. 1:
                          Validity of the Notice u/s 263:
                          The Tribunal found that the CIT issued the notice under s. 263 of the IT Act on 22nd Feb., 1999, without proper examination of the assessee's assessment records. The CIT's actions were based on a proposal received from the AO via fax on the same day, without the assessment records being available or examined by the CIT. The Tribunal concluded that the notice and the subsequent order under s. 263 were issued without application of mind and were, therefore, bad in law and void ab initio.

                          Issue No. 2:
                          Erroneous and Prejudicial Nature of the Assessment Order:
                          The Tribunal held that an order can be considered erroneous if it is passed in disregard of legal provisions or without proper enquiry. In this case, the AO had made detailed investigations and disallowed part of the assessee's claim on account of interest payable on deposits. The Tribunal found that the CIT did not establish how the assessment order was prejudicial to the Revenue. It was concluded that the assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue.

                          Issue No. 3:
                          CIT's Conclusions on Interest Payable:
                          The CIT concluded that the liability on account of interest payable on deposits was contingent and unascertained. However, the Tribunal found that the liability was contractual, ascertained, and determinate. The AO had made proper enquiries and disallowed interest on ungenuine deposits. The Tribunal held that the CIT's observations were vague and not supported by specific reasons, rendering the order under s. 263 invalid.

                          Issue No. 4:
                          Doctrine of Merger:
                          The Tribunal examined whether the assessment order had merged with the order of the CIT(A). It was found that the issue of allowability of deduction on account of interest payable on deposits was the subject matter of appeal before the CIT(A). The Tribunal held that once an issue is the subject matter of appeal, the CIT's jurisdiction under s. 263 is ousted. The assessment order had merged with the order of the CIT(A), and therefore, the CIT had no jurisdiction to revise the assessment order on this issue.

                          Issue No. 5:
                          Examination of Liability on Account of Interest Payable:
                          The Tribunal found that the liability to pay interest was contractual, ascertained, and determinate. The assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting, and the liability was provided for on an accrual basis as per the terms and conditions of the deposit schemes. The Tribunal concluded that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal quashed and set aside the notice under s. 263 dated 22nd Feb., 1999, and the order under s. 263 dated 22nd March, 1999. The assessee's appeal was allowed, and the CIT's order was declared bad in law and void ab initio.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found