Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner had jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to revise an assessment order after the assessment had been carried in appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the appellate authority had power to examine the matters sought to be revised.
Analysis: The assessment under section 143(3) was treated as a single composite order. The scope of merger was examined with reference to the appellate authority's powers under section 251, including the power to enhance assessment. The doctrine of merger was held not to depend merely on the items actually dealt with, but on the full extent of matters the appellate authority could lawfully examine. The Tribunal reconciled earlier High Court and Supreme Court authorities and concluded that, for section 263 purposes, once the assessment had merged in the appellate order, the Commissioner could not revise the same assessment on matters within that appellate jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The Commissioner lacked jurisdiction under section 263 to revise the assessment order on the disputed items, and the assessee succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The revisional order was set aside, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: For section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, an assessment order merges in the appellate order to the extent of matters the appellate authority had power to examine and determine, and the Commissioner cannot revise those matters thereafter.