Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 272A(2)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable for delay in filing Form No. 26 despite deduction and deposit of tax at source in time.
Analysis: The delay was examined in the light of the fact that the provision relating to deduction of tax at source from rent, etc. had been introduced for the first time for the assessment year in question, and the assessee's accountant could plausibly have been unfamiliar with the requirement of timely filing of Form No. 26. The record did not show that any advice from the regular tax consultant had been ignored. It was also noted that the claim of no loss of revenue had not been rebutted. On an overall view, the default was treated as arising from reasonable cause and not as a case warranting penal action.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 272A(2)(c) was not sustainable and was cancelled, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty for delay in filing the prescribed TDS information is not exigible where the default is shown to be due to reasonable cause and the revenue has suffered no loss.