Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1989 (11) TMI 65 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds CIT(A) deletions of ITO disallowances on loss, commission, and vehicle expenses The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletions of disallowances made by the ITO regarding loss, commission, and vehicle expenses. The disallowance of Rs. ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal upholds CIT(A) deletions of ITO disallowances on loss, commission, and vehicle expenses

                            The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletions of disallowances made by the ITO regarding loss, commission, and vehicle expenses. The disallowance of Rs. 2,50,000 as loss was deleted due to past acceptance of similar losses in the business, supported by reliable monthly returns. The Rs. 10,000 commission disallowance was overturned as the rate had remained consistent since 1974, and no past disallowances existed. Additionally, the Rs. 20,000 vehicle expenses disallowance was removed as the expenses were deemed revenue in nature, supported by maintenance and spare part costs.




                            Issues Involved:

                            1. Disallowance of Rs. 2,50,000 as loss by the ITO.
                            2. Deletion of Rs. 10,000 from commission by the CIT(A).
                            3. Deletion of Rs. 20,000 vehicle expenses by the CIT(A).

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            Issue 1: Disallowance of Rs. 2,50,000 as loss by the ITO

                            The ITO disallowed Rs. 2,50,000, citing discrepancies in the valuation of closing stock and lack of independent verification of the dissolving loss of 12,560.5 MT of salt due to heavy rains. The ITO noted that the auditors' remarks were based on information from the company's directors and that no similar loss was observed for other industrial salts. Additionally, the ITO pointed out the absence of claims made to salt authorities and the basis for valuing the closing stock.

                            The CIT(A) deleted this disallowance, relying on past history where similar losses were accepted. The Departmental Representative argued that each year should be independently assessed and past history should not influence current assessments. He also contended that the CIT(A) should not have relied on monthly statements not submitted to the ITO.

                            The assessee's counsel argued that the ITO could have verified the monthly statements submitted to the salt department, which were part of government records. The counsel highlighted that the loss percentage for the year was 44.68%, lower than in previous years, and supported by monthly returns and the auditor's report.

                            The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of the Rs. 2,50,000 disallowance, noting that such losses were a recurring feature in the salt manufacturing business and had been accepted in previous years. The Tribunal found no comparable case showing the loss claimed was excessive and emphasized the reliability of the monthly returns submitted to the salt department.

                            Issue 2: Deletion of Rs. 10,000 from commission by the CIT(A)

                            The ITO disallowed Rs. 10,000 out of Rs. 79,841 paid as commission to a sister concern, arguing it was excessive and unreasonable. The CIT(A) deleted this disallowance.

                            The Departmental Representative argued that the disallowance should be sustained due to the relationship between the assessee company and the sister concern.

                            The assessee's counsel contended that the commission was paid according to an agreement from 1974, and the rate had not increased despite an increase in sales. The agreement specified the services to be rendered and included a security deposit by the agents.

                            The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion, noting that the commission rate had remained the same since 1974 and no disallowance had been made in previous years.

                            Issue 3: Deletion of Rs. 20,000 vehicle expenses by the CIT(A)

                            The ITO disallowed Rs. 20,000 out of vehicle expenses, treating it as capital expenditure. The CIT(A) deleted this disallowance.

                            The Departmental Representative argued that the disallowance should be sustained based on the ITO's reasons.

                            The assessee's counsel argued that the expenses were for maintaining and running an old truck and were of a revenue nature. The ITO's observations supported this, as the expenses were for spare parts and maintenance.

                            The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion, agreeing that the expenses were of a revenue nature and the disallowance was not valid.

                            Conclusion:

                            The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s deletions of the disallowances for loss, commission, and vehicle expenses.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found