Co-operative society treated as dealer under sales tax law where structured seed transactions and commission charges showed business activity.

A co-operative society formed under a regulated Government scheme for Shanker-4 cotton-seeds was treated as carrying on business where its bye-laws authorised purchase, production, transformation and sale, and the record showed regular purchase and sale entries, sale bills, commission or administrative deductions, and credit of balances to members' accounts. The Government's control over price and supply did not change the commercial character of the transactions, so the society was regarded as a dealer under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act. Penalties for non-registration and delayed tax payment were, however, removed because the society acted under a bona fide belief that registration was unnecessary and there was no deliberate contumacy.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the society was a dealer under section 2(10) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 in respect of the supply and sale of Shanker-4 cotton-seeds routed through its accounts. (ii) Whether the penalties imposed for non-registration and late payment of tax under section 45(2)(c) and section 45(6) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 were liable to be removed.

Issue (i): Whether the society was a dealer under section 2(10) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 in respect of the supply and sale of Shanker-4 cotton-seeds routed through its accounts.

Analysis: The society was constituted to produce and market Shanker-4 cotton-seeds under a regulated scheme, and its bye-laws authorised purchase, production, transformation and sale of seeds, including transactions with members and non-members. The record showed regular purchase and sale entries, issuance of sale bills, deduction of amounts described as commission or administrative charges, and credit of balances to individual members' accounts. The regulated nature of price and supply by the Government did not alter the character of the transactions as purchases and sales. On the substance of the arrangement, the society carried on business of buying and selling goods and functioned for commission/remuneration.

Conclusion: The society was held to be a dealer under section 2(10) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969, against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the penalties imposed for non-registration and late payment of tax under section 45(2)(c) and section 45(6) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 were liable to be removed.

Analysis: The society was an agriculturist co-operative formed under a Government policy to produce Shanker-4 cotton-seeds, and the Tribunal accepted that it acted under a bona fide belief that it was not liable to register as a dealer. In view of the nature of the organisation and the absence of deliberate contumacy, the penal consequence for non-registration and delayed payment was not considered justified.

Conclusion: The penalties were removed in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded only to the extent of deletion of penalties, while the finding that the society was liable as a dealer was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a co-operative society, under a regulated scheme, buys and sells goods in its own name through a structured commercial arrangement and retains commission or administrative charges, the transaction amounts to business and the society is a dealer notwithstanding that the goods ultimately belong to members and prices are government-controlled.

---