<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (6) TMI 34 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55094</link>
    <description>A co-operative society formed under a regulated Government scheme for Shanker-4 cotton-seeds was treated as carrying on business where its bye-laws authorised purchase, production, transformation and sale, and the record showed regular purchase and sale entries, sale bills, commission or administrative deductions, and credit of balances to members&#039; accounts. The Government&#039;s control over price and supply did not change the commercial character of the transactions, so the society was regarded as a dealer under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act. Penalties for non-registration and delayed tax payment were, however, removed because the society acted under a bona fide belief that registration was unnecessary and there was no deliberate contumacy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (6) TMI 34 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55094</link>
      <description>A co-operative society formed under a regulated Government scheme for Shanker-4 cotton-seeds was treated as carrying on business where its bye-laws authorised purchase, production, transformation and sale, and the record showed regular purchase and sale entries, sale bills, commission or administrative deductions, and credit of balances to members&#039; accounts. The Government&#039;s control over price and supply did not change the commercial character of the transactions, so the society was regarded as a dealer under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act. Penalties for non-registration and delayed tax payment were, however, removed because the society acted under a bona fide belief that registration was unnecessary and there was no deliberate contumacy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>