Capital goods credit for plant components used in cement mill expansion was upheld under Rule 57Q.

Capital goods credit was admissible for items used as parts or components of a cement manufacturing plant under Rule 57Q, because the goods were used for erection and expansion of the cement mill and as supporting structure components. On the admitted facts, clause (b) of Explanation (1) to Rule 57Q treated such parts and components of plant as eligible capital goods, and the lower appellate authority's grant of credit was supported by the legal position and case law. The Revenue's challenge therefore failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether capital goods credit was admissible on items used as parts or components of a cement manufacturing plant under Rule 57Q.

Analysis: The items in question were used for erection and expansion of the cement mill and for installation of equipment as supporting structure components. The relevant legal framework treated parts and components of plant as eligible capital goods under clause (b) of Explanation (1) to Sub-rule (1) of Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. On the admitted facts, the goods were used as parts or components of the plant, and the lower appellate authority's allowance of credit was supported by the legal position and case law.

Conclusion: Capital goods credit was admissible, and the Revenue's challenge failed.

---