Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of the confirmed duty and penalties pending final hearing of the appeal.
Analysis: The dispute concerned classification of the goods cleared by the applicants as complete air-conditioners or only parts/sub-assemblies. The Board's circular indicated the essential components of an air-conditioning machine and clarified that a CKD/SKD assembly lacking any of those components would not acquire the character of a complete air-conditioning machine and would be classifiable as parts. On the facts noted, the absence of capillary lines at the time of clearance supported the applicants' contention, and the impugned view was found prima facie inconsistent with the circular.
Conclusion: The applicants established a strong prima facie case, and pre-deposit of the duty and penalties was waived during the pendency of the appeal.