<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 215 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54420</link>
    <description>Classification of goods as complete air-conditioners or as parts/sub-assemblies depended on whether the cleared CKD/SKD assembly contained the essential components identified in the Board&#039;s circular. The circular stated that if any essential component was absent, the assembly would not assume the character of a complete air-conditioning machine and would remain classifiable as parts. On the facts noted, the absence of capillary lines at clearance supported the applicants&#039; classification claim, and the contrary view was found prima facie inconsistent with the circular. The applicants accordingly established a strong prima facie case, and waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties was granted pending the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:02:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 215 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54420</link>
      <description>Classification of goods as complete air-conditioners or as parts/sub-assemblies depended on whether the cleared CKD/SKD assembly contained the essential components identified in the Board&#039;s circular. The circular stated that if any essential component was absent, the assembly would not assume the character of a complete air-conditioning machine and would remain classifiable as parts. On the facts noted, the absence of capillary lines at clearance supported the applicants&#039; classification claim, and the contrary view was found prima facie inconsistent with the circular. The applicants accordingly established a strong prima facie case, and waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties was granted pending the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>