Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the admitted actual consideration being higher than the consideration stated in the sale deed, the requirements of section 269C(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were satisfied so as to sustain acquisition of the property under Chapter XX-A.
Analysis: The appellant and the transferor admitted that the real consideration paid was Rs. 90,000, whereas the registered deed recited only Rs. 49,000. In the presence of this admission, and in the absence of any other material warranting a different view, the statutory conditions for invoking the acquisition provisions were treated as fulfilled. The earlier dismissal by the Tribunal and the High Court was based on the same admitted factual foundation.
Conclusion: The acquisition was upheld and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the parties admit that the real consideration for a transfer was substantially higher than the consideration disclosed in the sale deed, the requirements of section 269C(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 are satisfied for Chapter XX-A acquisition proceedings.