Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported compact fluorescent lamps without choke were liable to anti-dumping duty under Notification No. 128/2001 dated 21-12-2001.
Analysis: The imported goods were found to be compact fluorescent tubes/lamps with plastic lamp base, and the notification covered compact fluorescent lamps falling under Chapter 85, whether with choke or without choke, imported from the specified country and manufacturer. The goods were distinguished from the goods considered in the cited advance ruling, and the test report relied on by the Commissioner (Appeals) was not accepted in the present appeal. On the facts found, the imported goods were complete lamps without choke and not merely unrelated parts.
Conclusion: The goods were liable to anti-dumping duty under the notification and the Revenue's appeal succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was set aside and anti-dumping duty was held payable on the imported goods.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an anti-dumping notification expressly covers compact fluorescent lamps without choke, imported goods answering that description are chargeable to anti-dumping duty despite attempts to characterise them otherwise.