CESTAT Chennai Remands Appeal for Natural Justice Violation The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai allowed the appeal by way of remand due to denial of natural justice. The matter was remitted back to the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT Chennai Remands Appeal for Natural Justice Violation
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai allowed the appeal by way of remand due to denial of natural justice. The matter was remitted back to the Commissioner for de novo proceedings to consider test reports and re-determine all issues afresh. The misdeclaration charge under Section 111(m) may not apply if the brand name/trade name of the product is known to the department.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai allowed the appeal by way of remand as the order was considered to be bad due to denial of natural justice. The matter was remitted back to the Commissioner for de novo proceedings considering the test reports and re-determining all issues afresh. Misdeclaration charge under Section 111(m) may not apply if the brand name/trade name of the product is known to the department.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.