https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53900 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai allowed the appeal by way of remand due to denial of natural justice. The matter was remitted back to the Commissioner for de novo proceedings to consider test reports and re-determine all issues afresh. The misdeclaration charge under Section 111(m) may not apply if the brand name/trade name of the product is known to the department. en-us Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:45:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53900 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai allowed the appeal by way of remand due to denial of natural justice. The matter was remitted back to the Commissioner for de novo proceedings to consider test reports and re-determine all issues afresh. The misdeclaration charge under Section 111(m) may not apply if the brand name/trade name of the product is known to the department. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53900