Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied on the ground that the supplier had not actually paid duty on the inputs when the notification declared such inputs to be deemed duty-paid.
Analysis: The notification expressly provided that the duty of excise on the declared inputs shall be deemed to have been paid and that credit of the deemed duty so determined shall be allowed to the manufacturer of the final products. Once the inputs were statutorily treated as duty-paid under the notification, the actual payment of duty by the supplier could not be re-examined as a ground to deny credit.
Conclusion: Denial of Modvat credit on the ground of non-payment of duty by the supplier was not permissible, and the credit was rightly allowed.