<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 229 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53861</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied where the notification deemed the declared inputs to be duty-paid and allowed credit of the deemed duty to the manufacturer. Once the inputs were statutorily treated as duty-paid, the supplier&#039;s actual payment of duty could not be re-examined to refuse credit. The denial of credit on that ground was therefore impermissible, and the credit was rightly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:59:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 229 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53861</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied where the notification deemed the declared inputs to be duty-paid and allowed credit of the deemed duty to the manufacturer. Once the inputs were statutorily treated as duty-paid, the supplier&#039;s actual payment of duty could not be re-examined to refuse credit. The denial of credit on that ground was therefore impermissible, and the credit was rightly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>