Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount equal to 8% of the sale value collected by the assessee from the buyer of exempted goods could be demanded under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The assessee had cleared exempted goods and debited 8% of the sale value, which was reimbursed by the buyer. The amount so collected was not duty. Section 11D applies only where duty is collected and not paid into the exchequer. When the amount recovered is not duty, the provision is not attracted.
Conclusion: The demand under Section 11D was not sustainable and the assessee's appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was correctly allowed.