Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2019 (9) TMI 669 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal allows appeal, sets aside demand under Cenvat Credit Rules. The appeal by M/s. Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited was allowed by the Tribunal. The demand under Rule 3(5A) of Cenvat Credit Rules, ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                          Tribunal allows appeal, sets aside demand under Cenvat Credit Rules.

                          The appeal by M/s. Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited was allowed by the Tribunal. The demand under Rule 3(5A) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1985, was set aside. The Tribunal emphasized the requirement for the Revenue to prove that Cenvat credit was availed on capital goods cleared as waste and scrap and that goods must meet the criteria of being produced or manufactured in India to be considered excisable.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Confirmation of demand of Central Excise duty, interest, and imposition of penalty.
                          2. Applicability of Rule 3(5A) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
                          3. Classification and applicability of Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1985.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Confirmation of Demand of Central Excise Duty, Interest, and Imposition of Penalty:
                          The appeal was filed by M/s. Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited against the confirmation of Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty. The demand was initially confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority but was set aside and remanded by the Tribunal for re-examination. Upon re-examination, part of the demand was confirmed.

                          2. Applicability of Rule 3(5A) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004:
                          The appellant argued that the demand was confirmed on the ground that they had availed credit on used, scrap, and waste items, which were generated from items procured prior to March 1994. Rule 3(5A) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, was invoked by the Revenue, which mandates the manufacturer to pay an amount equal to the duty leviable on the transaction value when capital goods are cleared as waste and scrap.

                          The appellant contended that Rule 3(5A) applies only to capital goods as defined in Rule 2(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, and the goods in question did not fall within this definition. They further argued that the goods were not classified before demanding the duty, and there was no machinery provision to recover the amount under Rule 3(5A). The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's submissions, stating that unless the Revenue establishes that Cenvat credit was availed on the capital goods being removed as waste and scrap, Rule 3(5A) cannot be invoked. Consequently, the demand under Rule 3(5A) was set aside.

                          3. Classification and Applicability of Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1985:
                          The next issue related to the demand on waste and scrap items like MS Oil paint drums, spent zinc-based catalyst, used therminol, comox catalyst, etc. The Revenue invoked Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, which defines "excisable goods" as goods specified in the First Schedule and the Second Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and includes any article, material, or substance capable of being bought and sold for consideration.

                          The appellant relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Hindalco Industries Limited vs. UOI and the Tribunal decision in Hariyana Steel and Power vs. CCE. The Tribunal observed that Section 2(d) defines excisable goods, which must first be manufactured. The goods coming into existence as by-products during the manufacturing process cannot be treated as manufactured goods. The Tribunal cited the Supreme Court's ruling in Grasim Industries Ltd., which held that for goods to be excisable, they must satisfy the test of being produced or manufactured in India under Section 2(f) of the Act.

                          The Tribunal concluded that even if the items cleared answered the description under Section 2(d), duty could only be charged if they passed through the process under Section 2(f). Since this was not established, the demand on this count was also set aside.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal was allowed, and the demand under Rule 3(5A) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1985, was set aside. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the Revenue to establish that Cenvat credit was availed on capital goods being removed as waste and scrap and that the goods must satisfy the test of being produced or manufactured in India to be excisable.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found