1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Adjudication order challenged due to lack of documents and cross-examination opportunity. Tribunal orders fresh process.</h1> The case involved concerns raised by the appellants regarding an adjudication order issued without providing relied upon documents or the opportunity for ... Adjudication - Natural justice Issues:Adjudication order passed without providing relied upon documents and cross-examination opportunity.Analysis:The appellants raised concerns regarding the adjudication order being issued without providing them with the relied upon documents or the chance to cross-examine the witnesses whose statements were used in the proceedings. It was acknowledged that the relied upon documents have now been made available as per the Tribunal's direction. The appellants' counsel emphasized the need for the adjudication process to be restarted, allowing them to submit a revised reply to the show cause notice and conduct cross-examinations.Upon reviewing the case records and hearing arguments from both parties, it was determined that due to the deficiencies in the initial proceedings, the matter needed to be reconsidered afresh. Consequently, the appeals were remanded with specific directions for the fresh adjudication process. The directions included:(i) The appellants were instructed to submit a revised reply to the show cause notice within two weeks of receiving all relied upon documents.(ii) The Commissioner was directed to schedule cross-examinations of witnesses at his convenience, starting within two weeks from the current date, ensuring completion within one month from the reply submission date. It was clarified that the commencement of cross-examination should not be contingent on the revised reply submission.(iii) The de novo adjudication process was mandated to be finalized, and a new order issued within three months from the current date, ensuring a timely resolution of the matter.