Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether electroplating machinery falling under Heading 85.43 was eligible for exemption under Notification No. 56/95 as machinery used for the production of a commodity.
Analysis: The exemption was held to turn on the expression "production of a commodity" and not on a restricted notion of manufacture. The Tribunal distinguished the earlier view that electroplating merely improved an existing article, and accepted the appellants' technical material showing that the machines were essential for bringing about a changed or different commodity in several industrial applications. On the evidence, electroplating and electro-machining were treated as processes integral to producing marketable commodities with the required specifications. The wider meaning of production was applied, and the exemption was not read in a manner that would make the entry ineffective for machines classifiable under Heading 85.43.
Conclusion: The machinery was held to be covered by the notification, and the denial of exemption was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification covers machinery used for the production of a commodity, the expression "production" is broader than "manufacture" and extends to machinery employed in an intermediate process that brings about a changed or marketable commodity.