Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported Ultra Sonic Cleaning Machine was classifiable under Heading 84.59(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Analysis: The Court found no infirmity in the Tribunal's determination on the classification of the imported machine. The classification adopted by the Tribunal was accepted on the basis that the machine fell within the stated tariff heading.
Conclusion: The imported Ultra Sonic Cleaning Machine was classifiable under Heading 84.59(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the challenge to that classification failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the appellate forum finds no infirmity in the classification adopted by the Tribunal, the tariff entry applied to the imported goods will be upheld.