Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether white cement packed and marked specially for builders, and sold to builders for civil construction, was liable to valuation under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or under Section 4 of that Act.
Analysis: The goods were prominently marked as specially packed for builders and not for retail sale. On that footing, they were treated as intended for a particular industry and therefore outside the Packaged Commodities Rules under Rule 34. The Board's circular also supported assessment under Section 4 where goods were sold in bulk at contracted prices. The Tribunal's earlier decision on a similar issue was applied.
Conclusion: The builder-supplied white cement was not liable to valuation under Section 4A and was correctly assessed under Section 4; the demand and penalties were unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeals were allowed and the impugned order was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods packed and clearly marked for a specific industrial use and sold in bulk at contracted prices, not for retail sale, are to be assessed under the ordinary valuation provision rather than on retail price basis.