Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cement cleared in packaged form to construction industry consumers qualified for the concessional rate of duty under the relevant notification by treating construction as a service industry and by applying the exclusion for packaged commodities meant for institutional or industrial consumers.
Analysis: The notification was applied in the context of clearances made to institutional consumers. The construction activity was treated as a service industry in the relevant commercial and fiscal understanding, and the Tribunal's view was consistent with earlier co-ordinate Bench decisions. The assessee had satisfied the other conditions for the benefit under the notification, and the mere fact that the cement was packed did not defeat the claim on the facts found by the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to the concessional rate of duty under the notification.
Final Conclusion: The revenue's challenge to the Tribunal's grant of notification benefit failed, and the assessee retained the concessional duty treatment.
Ratio Decidendi: Where cement is cleared to institutional consumers in circumstances covered by the notification and the construction sector is treated as a service industry, the concessional excise benefit cannot be denied merely because the goods are in packed form.