Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties in respect of cement cleared at the concessional rate under Notification No. 4/2006-C.E., and whether the goods could be treated as covered by the exemption meant for industrial or institutional consumers.
Analysis: The concessional rate under clause 1C of Notification No. 4/2006-C.E. was considered in the light of the Explanation to the Third Proviso to Serial No. 1C, which links valuation to goods not required to bear retail sale price declarations under the Packaged Commodities Rules. Rule 2A(b) of the Standards of Weights and Measurements (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1997 excludes packaged commodities meant for industrial consumers or institutional consumers from the relevant chapter. On the material placed before it, the Tribunal noted the appellant's reliance on precedent treating construction as an industry and also the earlier grant of unconditional stay on an identical issue.
Conclusion: The appellant established a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties, and the stay application was allowed.