Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether clearances made by a 100% Export-Oriented Undertaking into the Domestic Tariff Area against foreign exchange under Paragraph 9.10 of the EXIM Policy 1997-2002 could be counted as exports for the purpose of the 50% FOB-value limit under Notification No. 2/95-C.E.
Analysis: Notification No. 2/95-C.E. granted concessional excise duty for goods produced in a 100% Export-Oriented Undertaking and sold in India in accordance with Paragraphs 9.9 and 9.20 of the EXIM Policy. Paragraph 9.9(b) permitted DTA sales up to 50% of the FOB value of exports, while Paragraph 9.10 treated supplies made into DTA against payment in foreign exchange as counting towards export performance. The Tribunal held that these provisions operated on different planes, and that DTA supplies against foreign exchange were to be treated as deemed exports for the purpose of computing the entitlement under Paragraph 9.9. The Tribunal also followed earlier decisions holding that once the Development Commissioner had granted permission for DTA sale up to a fixed value, the Revenue could not deny the benefit by restricting the base to physical exports alone.
Conclusion: Such DTA clearances against foreign exchange were liable to be treated as exports for the purpose of the notification and the 50% FOB-value limit, and the demand of duty could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the assessee retained the benefit of concessional duty on the disputed DTA clearances.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the policy expressly treats DTA supplies against foreign exchange as export performance, those supplies must be included in computing the FOB-value base for eligibility under a notification linked to Paragraph 9.9 of the EXIM Policy.