<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 179 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52072</link>
    <description>DTA clearances by a 100% Export-Oriented Undertaking made against foreign exchange were treated as deemed exports under Paragraph 9.10 of the EXIM Policy 1997-2002, and therefore had to be included in computing the FOB-value base for the 50% DTA entitlement under Notification No. 2/95-C.E. The provisions operated on different planes, but the policy expressly counted such foreign-exchange DTA supplies as export performance for entitlement purposes. On that basis, the Tribunal accepted that the Revenue could not confine the computation to physical exports alone, and the duty demand on the disputed clearances failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 179 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52072</link>
      <description>DTA clearances by a 100% Export-Oriented Undertaking made against foreign exchange were treated as deemed exports under Paragraph 9.10 of the EXIM Policy 1997-2002, and therefore had to be included in computing the FOB-value base for the 50% DTA entitlement under Notification No. 2/95-C.E. The provisions operated on different planes, but the policy expressly counted such foreign-exchange DTA supplies as export performance for entitlement purposes. On that basis, the Tribunal accepted that the Revenue could not confine the computation to physical exports alone, and the duty demand on the disputed clearances failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>